Skip to main content

Torsten Krol's CALLISTO!!

From around Christmas time, I had a good momentum going in terms of reading the stack of books I’ve got lying beside my bed. I knocked out 3 titles in the span of a month, which for me, is a fast pace. But when I started reading Torsten Krol’s Callisto, the pace grinded to a near halt. It’s not that it’s a bad story, but I just never felt that connection with the characters as I had with the last book I read (that being Slam by Nick Hornby, love, love, love).

Callisto follows a big lummox of a character named Deefus Odell (an astute individual, as you can tell by that name). Deefus is from the south and isn’t the brightest crayon, but somehow he manages to get by. Without a clear direction in life, he decides that the only thing to do is to join the army and serve the country. He drives across Kansas to hopefully do just that. Unfortunately, his Chevy breaks down in the middle of this small town called Callisto and it’s here where all the fun begins.

He meets a local yokel named Dean who helps him out by setting him up with his lawn mowing business. By pure accident, Deefus accidently kills Dean one night which sets off a series of events, putting him at the center of a terrorism situation, involving the news media, drug dealers, the FBI, the government and the church. If it all sounds zany, well it is. The story is a satire on the state of the US and the war on terror.

I picked it up at the book store not knowing too much about it. I read the back, was intrigued and also quickly browsed some reviews online before picking it up. One of the reviews I read described the story as Forrest Gump-like, which I was sold on. However, that analogy is very loose. Deefus is Forrest Gump-like in that he’s naïve and a bit slow, but that’s where the comparisons end. Because of his southern charm, it’s hard to avoid the comparison of Deefus’ speaking skills to that of George Dubya, which provides some good comedy.

The story was a bit too slow moving for me, that plus the characters that I couldn’t connect to made it a difficult read to plow through. However, the last third of the book moves well when pieces of the puzzle start coming together. Still, the ending leaves a bit more to be desired. The story is laced with dark and oftentimes, odd humour. But at the same time, it's never laugh out loud type humour.

Author Torsten Krol is a bit of an enigma himself. He supposedly resides in Australia, but not very much else is known about the elusive author. Some say that it’s just a pseudonym for a more well known author and interestingly, some claim that he is Stephen King. I think a story about this mysterious Krol would be more interesting, if it is indeed Stephen King.

For me, the book is a tough recommend only because the pacing didn’t work for me. If you’re up for reading a satire then I suppose it might work for you. Til next time, later geeks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The League of Denial (2013)

The topic of concussions in sports is a dialogue that’s been growing the past number of years.  Do a search on ‘concussions’ and ‘football’ and you’ll get several thousand hits on the controversy that’s surrounded the sport.  It’s a challenging topic as the research is all relatively new, and the topic itself challenges the mentality and philosophy adopted by football loving Americans.  Now, I’m not a fan of football or NFL but when I saw this book lying at the local bookstore, my interest was piqued.  Although I’m not a fan of football, those that know me know that I’m an unabashed fan of prowrestling.  Talks about concussions are also quite a hot topic even within the prowrestling sub-culture.  Earlier this year, one of the hottest wrestlers of the current era, Daniel Bryan, retired early at the age of 34 due to a history of concussion related issues.  Interestingly, he was not permitted to return to the ring due to the disapproval by WWE’s medic...

Finally, the Xbox 360!!

So as I mentioned in a previous post, I received an Xbox 360 for Christmas from my dad. A great present it was! I've had 3 weeks to enjoy it so I guess I can give you my impressions of it now. First the controller. In truth, I haven't felt a controller this comfortable in my gaming life before. As a child who grew up on the 8-bit generation, with just a directional pad and 2 buttons, there was quite a learning curve getting used to using two analog sticks at the same time. You might say, "Hey Lam, how bout the PS2? You have that machine, and that has analog sticks". True, but of the twenty or so games I have for that, all of them used either only 1 analog stick, or allowed the option to switch on to the directional pad. Using 2 sticks at the same time was at first just uncomfortable. This made for all sorts of trouble as I was playing Gears of War . Luckily for me, I had computer controlled teammates that watched my back. I love the Media Center capabilities...

MAX PAYNE was oh so PAYNEFUL!!!

What a failure this was. An EPIC FAILURE~! And I'll tell you why. This movie had everything going for it which was why it made the failure seem so huge. It had star power. It had a very competent director. The visual style was there. It had a simple storyline... a storyline that was basically fuck-proof because it's so basic. The effects (when there were any) were also pretty great. So where did they go wrong? Pacing. If the first two-thirds of the film was like the last third, I think it would have been a fine film. Not great by any means, but fine. I mean, there was hardly any action in the first hour. It was all talk and build up. Every 5 minutes I was saying to myself, "okay, something cool is gonna happen now". But it never came. I think had they added 2 or 3 big action sequences during that hour, that it would have helped the film breathe and flow better. I mean, didn't they realize that the source material was an action game? Max Payne is ba...